
Stop hunting across scattered repos. Search by task and install the best prompts and orchestrators in one command.

Community-built prompts and orchestrators, organised around the work you need Claude Code to do.
Turn the current conversation into a spec and publish it to the project issue tracker — no interview, just synthesis of what you've already discussed.
Build a throwaway prototype to answer a design question. Use when the user wants to sanity-check whether a state model or logic feels right, or explore what a UI should look like.
Scan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a visual HTML report, then grill through whichever one you pick.
Build and sharpen a project's domain model. Use when the user wants to pin down domain terminology or a ubiquitous language, record an architectural decision, or when another skill needs to maintain the domain model.
A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design, which also creates docs (ADR's and glossary) as we go.
Configure this repo for the engineering skills — set up its issue tracker, triage label vocabulary, and domain doc layout. Run once before first use of the other engineering skills.
Move issues and external PRs through a state machine of triage roles — categorise, verify, grill if needed, and write agent-ready briefs.
Use when you need to resolve an in-progress git merge/rebase conflict.
Plan a huge chunk of work — more than one agent session can hold — as a shared map of investigation tickets on your issue tracker, and resolve them one at a time until the way to the destination is clear.
Break a plan, spec, or the current conversation into a set of tracer-bullet tickets, each declaring its blocking edges, published to the configured tracker — edges as text in a local file, or native blocking links on a real tracker.
Deep-dive spec interviewer. Reads a file or requirement, analyzes it against the codebase, then conducts a rigorous 1-on-1 interview using AskUserQuestion to produce a comprehensive, opinionated specification document. Acts as a collaborative architect with active pushback.
Implement a piece of work based on a spec or set of tickets.
Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing/slow.
Investigate a question against high-trust primary sources and capture the findings as a Markdown file in the repo. Use when the user wants a topic researched, docs or API facts gathered, or reading legwork delegated to a background agent.
Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/PRD asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel…
Shared vocabulary for designing deep modules. Use when the user wants to design or improve a module's interface, find deepening opportunities, decide where a seam goes, make code more testable or AI-navigable, or when another skill needs the deep-module vocabulary.
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.
Test-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.

Spellbook replaces repo hunting with a repeatable flow: search in the language of the job, inspect the skill, then install it.
npx skills add spellbook/<skill>Describe the task, not the package name.
Review the prompt, author, and intended trigger.
Bring the skill into your workflow in one command.